Would we be safer without helmets?

Originally posted on January 25, 2011 at 12:31 pm

There is no doubt Mikael Colville-Andersen is pro-bicycling. A filmmaker and photographer, he is also the head of Copenhagenize Consulting, a firm that advocates for taming urban spaces, and publisher of a popular blog by the same name.

But when asked to present at a TED lecture, he brought some startling opinions. His presentation, which you can watch below, advocates against helmet use, citing a "culture of fear" that the world has created as a deterrent to bicycle riding.

His reasoning: that studies have shown that cyclists are more likely to be injuried while riding while wearing a helmet, that advocating and promoting helmet use deters new cyclists and that bicycle helmets are designed for unrealistic impact angles.

But some of his assesments take logic a bit too far. Citing a helmet promotion in Denmark as the sole cause in decline in ridership ignores any and all other factors that could have resulted in a small, 5 percent decline in 2008. He also argues that because the health benefits of cycling far outweigh the risks – statisticly at least – helmet use should not be a factor when promoting bicycling.

I guess his real argument is just that: He is not anti-helmet, but anti-helmet promotion.

I dunno. I’m going to keep wearing mine. Will you? 


Posted in Advocacy News

This site is an independently-operated mirror and is not affiliated with Dirt Rag, Rotating Mass Media or any of its current or former subsidiaries. No copyright is claimed for any content appearing herein.